M&A: Earn-out vs. Performance Guarantee

Linkedin Post

I find that clients and other advisers sometimes confuse the concepts of an earn-out with a performance guarantee. They tell me they want a performance guarantee clause in the sale and purchase agreement, but upon further probing, it becomes clear that what they actually want is an earn-out clause.

Both earn-out and performance guarantee are common mechanisms used in the context of M&A to bridge gaps in valuation and mitigate risks associated with the deal. However, they are distinct concepts.

๐„๐š๐ซ๐ง-๐Ž๐ฎ๐ญ

An earn-out is a contingent payment arrangement in an M&A deal where a portion of the purchase price is based on the future performance of the target company. The purchaser will pay the seller additional payments, known as the earn-out, if the target company meets the performance metrics or milestones after the acquisition, as agreed between the purchaser and seller.

Earn-outs are usually linked to financial or operational targets, such as profits, revenue, or customer retention.

Earn-outs are structured over a defined period, usually 1 to 3 years in my experience.

If the target company does not meet the predefined performance metrics or milestones during the earn-out period, the seller will not receive the additional payments.

๐๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐†๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž

A performance guarantee is an assurance given by the seller to ensure that the target company achieves a specific performance level after the acquisition, as agreed between the seller and purchaser.

Performance guarantees may also be tied to financial or operational targets, but unlike earn-outs, performance guarantees are not contingent payments.

If the target company fails to meet the performance metrics or milestones during the period as agreed between the seller and purchaser, the purchaser will have recourse against the seller, which may include financial compensation or other remedies as specified in the agreement.

malaysiancorporatelawyer
mergersandacquisitions

This post was first posted on LinkedIn on 26 October 2023.

Linkedin Post
Earn-out: A postponed dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The disclosure letter: Why founders selling their companies should not treat it as an afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellersโ€™ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-party consents in a share sale: What sellers should check before negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …