Dividend of a Malaysian company: What directors and shareholders should know

Company Law

1. It is permissible to use preference shares as an instrument to give investors (i.e. preference shareholders) priority to receive payment of dividend over ordinary shareholders. This preferential right must be stated in the constitution of the company.

2. A company may only distribute dividend to the shareholders out of profits of the company available if the company is solvent.

3. ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ dividend is distributed to any shareholder, the distribution must be authorised by the directors of the company.

4. The directors may authorise a distribution at such time and in such amount as the directors consider appropriate, if the directors are satisfied that the company will be solvent immediately after the distribution is made. The company is regarded as solvent if the company is able to pay its debts as and when the debts become due within 12 months immediately after the distribution is made.

5. If, after a distribution is authorised and before it is made, the directors cease to be satisfied on reasonable grounds that the company will be solvent immediately after the distribution is made, the directors must take all necessary steps to prevent the distribution.

6. Every director of the company who wilfully pays or authorises the payment of any improper or unlawful distribution shall, on conviction, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or a fine not exceeding 3 million ringgit or to both.

7. The company may recover from a shareholder any amount of distribution paid to the shareholder which exceeds the value of any distribution that could properly have been made, unless the shareholder (a) has received the distribution in good faith; and (b) has no knowledge that the company did not satisfy the solvency test.

8. Every director of a company who wilfully pays or permits to be paid any dividend, which he knows from his knowledge is not profits shall also be ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ข๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž to the company to the extent of the amount exceeded the value of any distribution of dividends that could properly have been made.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#companiesact2016

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 16 August 2022.

Lawyering
Learning to Appreciate the Small Things

One afternoon, I walked into the office, feeling unsettled after a discussion with another adviser. As I took my laptop from my bag and placed it on my desk, something caught my eye-a small handmade paper box, stapled at the sides, neatly holding some binder clips. The day before, I …

ESG
The ESG Challenge in M&A: Why Itโ€™s Harder Than You Think

1. Fragmented Laws ESG laws and regulations are fragmented, with no centralised framework. This makes tracking relevant requirements and ensuring compliance particularly challenging for companies. Conducting legal due diligence on ESG in M&A transactions which goes beyond obtaining a target companyโ€™sโ€™ confirmation on compliance and getting real data may be …

ESG
ESG in legal due diligence for M&A transactions

As ESG considerations become increasingly prominent in the business landscape, itโ€™s prudent to consider ESG in M&A legal due diligence. Below are the key legal requirements and corporate governance code to consider in relation to ESG in M&A legal due diligence: Environmental 1. Environmental Quality Act 1974 (EQA) ย The EQA, …