Three mistakes to avoid when drafting defined terms

Drafting

I remember the difficulties I had in drafting defined terms for contracts in drafting class.

I tried to be as precise as possible.

I fretted over where to place (“[defined term]”) in a contract. The meaning might change depending on where I put (“[defined term]”) within a sentence.

In actual practice, we rarely draft contracts from scratch. There are usually precedents to refer to. However, oversights or mistakes may also arise due to reliance on precedents.
***
Three mistakes to avoid when drafting defined terms in contracts:

1. Definitions that are overly generic.

E.g. “Products” means products which are supplied by Party A to Party B under this agreement.

The problem with the above overly generic defined term is that a reader would not have any clue what products are being supplied under the agreement.

An alternative (which I think is a better way) would be to define the products with detailed description set out in a schedule to the agreement.

2. Same subject matter being defined more than once in an agreement.

E.g. In the recital of the agreement, it is stated that Party A would supply …. (“Products”) to Party B.

“Products” is defined again in the definition section of the agreement but with some variations to the definition of “Products” in the recital.

Are you confused yet as to what “Products” are being supplied by Party A which is the subject matter of the agreement?

3. Not defining the term used.

E.g. The agreement may be terminated if there is a change in Control of either party.

You search through the entire agreement, but “Control” is not defined.

Does “Control” in the agreement mean 33% or more of voting shares in a party (as referred in the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007), or more than 50% of voting shares, which allow for the passing of an ordinary resolution?

If “Control” is not defined, how would the parties determine whether the termination clause is triggered whenever there is a change in the shareholding in either party?

What other mistakes relating to defined terms do you usually encounter?

#malaysiancorporatelawyer
#contractdrafting

First posted on Linkedin on 26 November 2021.

Linkedin Post
Preference Shares: A Path Through Malaysia’s Equity Restrictions

Regulatory equity restrictions don’t always mean “no entry” for investors in Malaysia. If you’re restricted from holding ordinary shares in certain sectors due to regulatory policy, preference shares may offer a practical alternative. You may want to consider preference shares if: 1.    The sector has no restrictions on preference shares. This …

Company Law
Does family-owned company require formal shareholders’ approval for issuance of shares?

“This is my family-owned company. Do we still need formal shareholders’ approval to issue shares?” Yes. Under section 75 of the Companies Act 2016, directors cannot exercise their power to allot shares without prior shareholders’ approval. This is a legal requirement even if all the shareholders are family members. Skipping …

Linkedin Post
Pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders agreement

Most people I know are reluctant to pay for proper legal advice when it comes to shareholders’ agreements. Many assume shareholders’ agreements are just templates. However, in practice, especially in M&A or fundraising, these agreements must align with the Companies Act 2016 and other relevant regulatory requirements. Otherwise, what is …