Who should be parties to the agreement?

Mergers and acquisitions
Contracts

I occasionally come across the following oversight in shareholders’ agreements and joint venture agreements.

Scenario 1

The cover page and signing page of the agreement state that the parties to the agreement are Party A and Party B only. However, the recital states Party A, Party B and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement) have entered into the agreement. There are also provisions in the agreement which grants rights and imposes obligations on the company.

Scenario 2

The agreement states that the parties to the agreement are Party X, Party Y and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement). However, the agreement does not grant any rights or impose any obligations on the company.

In the agreements above, questions arise as to whether the subject matter company is/should be a party to the agreement.

If the intention is to grant rights and impose obligations on the subject matter company, it should be included as a party to the agreement. This should also be reflected on the cover page and signing page.

Otherwise, there is no need to include the subject matter company as a party to the shareholders’ agreement or joint venture agreement.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#contractdrafting

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 17 January 2021.

Due Diligence
How Founders and Sellers Can Speed Up Their M&A Deals

02122025 How Founders and Sellers Can Speed Up Their M&A Deals I once worked on an M&A deal that everyone expected to close fast. It was a limited legal due diligence on a Malaysian target company. It did not have voluminous documents for review. However, what should have been a …

Due Diligence
Where Company Secretaries Make the Biggest Impact in M&A

At the heart of every legal due diligence for M&A transactions is verification of share ownership. One of the documents requested to verify share ownership is the register of members. It seems like a simple request, yet during some due diligence exercises, I have been provided with the following except …

Due Diligence
M&A Tip: Why Sellers Should Provide Share Ownership Documents (Not Just the CCM Search)

One of the biggest sources of delay in Malaysian M&A due diligence is surprisingly simple: Sellers often provide a company search from the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM) when what lawyers really need are the statutory share documents. A lawyer conducting proper due diligence will typically request documents such as:  Shareholders’ …