Who should be parties to the agreement?

Mergers and acquisitions
Contracts

I occasionally come across the following oversight in shareholders’ agreements and joint venture agreements.

Scenario 1

The cover page and signing page of the agreement state that the parties to the agreement are Party A and Party B only. However, the recital states Party A, Party B and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement) have entered into the agreement. There are also provisions in the agreement which grants rights and imposes obligations on the company.

Scenario 2

The agreement states that the parties to the agreement are Party X, Party Y and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement). However, the agreement does not grant any rights or impose any obligations on the company.

In the agreements above, questions arise as to whether the subject matter company is/should be a party to the agreement.

If the intention is to grant rights and impose obligations on the subject matter company, it should be included as a party to the agreement. This should also be reflected on the cover page and signing page.

Otherwise, there is no need to include the subject matter company as a party to the shareholders’ agreement or joint venture agreement.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#contractdrafting

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 17 January 2021.

Lawyering
The Kindness That Stays, 20 Years On

I last saw them in 2007. They are two kind souls who made my years studying in the UK such a beautiful chapter in my life. I have been thinking about them lately and finally reached out after all these years. Whenever I look back on my time in the …

Linkedin Post
Why M&A Deals Fail

As an M&A lawyer, most of my time goes into the legal documents – drafting and negotiating agreements, representations, warranties, conditions precedent, etc. However, the deals I have seen delayed or aborted were not because of legal documents. A deal was aborted when geopolitical tension escalated while parties were going …

Linkedin Post
When a Seller is Paid in Shares, Instead of Cash

In an M&A transaction, a buyer which is also a company may offer to pay by issuing its own shares to the seller, instead of paying in cash. How is this different compared to a cash deal? The seller is not just selling. The seller is also “buying” into the …