Who should be parties to the agreement?

Mergers and acquisitions
Contracts

I occasionally come across the following oversight in shareholders’ agreements and joint venture agreements.

Scenario 1

The cover page and signing page of the agreement state that the parties to the agreement are Party A and Party B only. However, the recital states Party A, Party B and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement) have entered into the agreement. There are also provisions in the agreement which grants rights and imposes obligations on the company.

Scenario 2

The agreement states that the parties to the agreement are Party X, Party Y and the company (i.e. the subject matter of the agreement). However, the agreement does not grant any rights or impose any obligations on the company.

In the agreements above, questions arise as to whether the subject matter company is/should be a party to the agreement.

If the intention is to grant rights and impose obligations on the subject matter company, it should be included as a party to the agreement. This should also be reflected on the cover page and signing page.

Otherwise, there is no need to include the subject matter company as a party to the shareholders’ agreement or joint venture agreement.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#contractdrafting

This post was first posted on Linkedin on 17 January 2021.

Linkedin Post
Earn-Out: A Postponed Dispute?

An earn-out is often the solution when a buyer and seller cannot agree on price. The seller believes the business is worth more than what the buyer is willing to pay upfront. So, the parties resolve the issue by deferring the portion of the price they cannot agree on, with …

Linkedin Post
The Disclosure Letter: Why Founders Selling Their Companies Should Not Treat It as an Afterthought

When founders sell their companies, the scope of legal work usually focuses on the share sale and purchase agreement (SPA). The disclosure letter is sometimes treated as secondary to the SPA but it should not have been the case. The disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to the sellers’ representations …

Linkedin Post
Third-Party Consents in a Share Sale: What Sellers Should Check Before Negotiating

When a company is sold, due diligence is usually conducted by the buyer, not the seller. That means the consents required from regulators, other shareholders, financiers or IP licensors to complete the sale are often only discovered when the buyer’s lawyers identify them during legal due diligence. By then, the …