Why Legal Due Diligence is Essential in Acquisitions

Due Diligence

I usually get a bit concerned when potential buyers say they do not require legal due diligence on the target company or business. This is usually because they believe they already know the business or due to budget constraints.

Unless the buyers are already involved in the management of the target, legal due diligence should not be omitted.

Legal due diligence is required to:

  • Uncover any deal breaker
  • Assess the value of the target acquisition and the purchase price
  • Facilitate negotiation with the seller
  • Determine the most efficient acquisition terms and structure
  • Decide if the seller or the target company should address any issues identified during legal due diligence before or after the transaction, taking into account the nature of the issues, the urgency of the deal, and the associated risks
  • Identify any consents or notifications required for the proposed acquisition
  • Assess the need for ancillary agreements such as agreement for shared services or transitional services or employment agreement for key management.
  • Plan the integration of the target company or business with the buyers’ existing business post-acquisition.

If you are not sure whether legal due diligence is required for your target, consider the points above.

#malaysiancorporatelawyer

#legalduediligence

This post first posted on LinkedIn on 4 October 2024.

Due Diligence
Legal Due Diligence on Public Listed Companies in Malaysia

When conducting legal due diligence on public listed companies (PLCs) in Malaysia, the scope of due diligence is limited by the laws of insider trading. Insider trading occurs when someone uses confidential, non-public information about a company to make a profit or avoid a loss in the stock market. Therefore, …

Linkedin Post
Don’t Rush the Disclosure Letter in M&A Transactions

In M&A transactions, a disclosure letter sets out the exceptions to seller’s representations and warranties in a sale and purchase agreement for an M&A transaction (“SPA”). Instead of negotiating heavily on sellers’ representations and warranties in SPAs, it is common to provide in SPAs that sellers’ representations and warranties are …

Lawyering
Is Corporate Practice Less Stressful Than Litigation?

I was asked whether being in corporate practice is less stressful and less hectic than being in litigation practice. I think this kind of generalisation is not particularly helpful. Different law firms have different cultures and expectations of their lawyers. Clients’ demand would also determine whether a particular project or …